Thursday, February 14, 2008
Case Number 1: A Case of Lost Love
Filed on February 14, 2008
Point1: TIME
First party says “I am busy, that’s why I don’t have time to talk to you and to visit you.”
Second party says “Three years ago, your not like that. If you finished all your stuffs at school, then you can have time to talk to me the whole night.”
THE VERDICT: first party is GUILTY!
Fact: At school, the first party spends time chatting with friends and texting other people, who incidentally are males and one of them is romantically involved with the first party.
Point2: EFFORTS FOR SPECIAL OCCASIONS
First party says “Its valentines and you don’t have any efforts to give me even a single rose! Monthsary, Anniversary, Christmas and New Year has passed and I have never received any gift from you”
Second party says “You know my current situation, I don’t have work yet and I don’t have money”
First party: “if you had been saving kahit piso-piso isang araw, then you could have saved money to buy me even a chocnut”
Second party: “Mag-intay ka lang, pag nagkatrabaho na ako…………..”
THE VERDICT: Second party is NOT GUILTY.
Fact: “You cannot eat flowers” –second party. Flowers and chocolate will never measure the love that the second party can give to first party. It’s just a matter of waiting, patience is a virtue.
Time frame: within six months. If second party still has no work, and no efforts during special occasions had been performed, then file this case again and the jury will determine if this is another case of lost love.
Mind Says:
“Sana isipin mo nalang lahat ng sinabi ko at tanong mo sa sarili mo bakit ka ganyan at kung bakit lagi akong nagagalit sayo…..”
(sigh) “he’s right. He’s always been right. I act as if I’ve been righteous, but I was totally doing the opposite.”
Case Number 2: A Case of Schizophrenic Love
Filed on February 14, 2008
The text below are duces tecum (documentary evidence) and duces testificandum (testimony) of both first and third parties for this case
First Party: “I love you, but I don’t want to.”
Third Party: “I love you, too, mahal. Pwede mo ba ako paload?”
First Party: “Eh bola ka pala eh, wag mo na ako paikutin”
Third Party: “Basta, mahal na mahal na mahal kita. Mula sa kaibuturan ng puso ko’t kaluluwa, ikaw lang”
First party: “Hayaan mo lang mahalin kita, wala akong iniintay na kapalit….”
Third party: “Alam mo, wag mo na hatiin ang pagmamahal mo, ibuhos mo nalang lahat sa kanya, diba nagkakaproblema ka lang sakin?”
First party: “ganyan ka ba sa mga kaibigan mo, araw-araw mo tinetext, at nagaalala ka pa kung kumain na, nakapasok ba ng maayos, etc, etc…”
Third party: “ano ka ba ayos na tayo………..”
Third Party: “Mahal, paalam ako sau ah? Okay lang ba, gagala muna ako?”
First Part: “Wala naman ako magagawa kung ano gusto mo gawin diba? Bakit tayo ba?”
First Party: “kelan tayo magkikita ulit?”
Third party: “Ahm, basta set natin yan, sabay kiss and hug kita”
First Party: “Talaga lang ha? Abangan ko yan….”
Third party: “Gawin ko yun..”
First Party: “di mo naman kailangang gawin kung napipilitan ka lang diba?”
Third Party: “Gawin ko yun, xe lab kita”
First party: (nang-aasar na remarks)
Third Party: Kea kung aku seu, tanggalin mu ung pic ku s fs mu, nandidiri aku, bka icpn nila pumapatol aku sa mataba at mukhang bakla…
THE VERDICT: BOTH PARTIES ARE NOT GUILTY. HOWEVER, THE JURY FOUND BOTH PARTIES TO BE INSANE AND DEMENTED WHICH MEANS THEY ARE MENTALLY INCAPACITATED TO FALL IN LOVE. The jury further DECIDED TO SEND BOTH PARTIES to A MENTAL INSTITUTION FOR FURTHER REHABILITATION which will last for ABOUT 10 YEARS.
